Resolution Watch · all references · resolution-risk micro-update · living reference · last measured from UMA resolution records (Gamma), classified by market title as of 2026-10-22

Titles with no checkable threshold dispute far more

On Polymarket, markets whose title states no checkable threshold dispute more than those whose title does, in both samples (high-volume: 25.3% vs 1.3%; chronological: 0.6% vs 0.4%). Read from the title only; the resolution rules were not read. Direction is the fact; magnitude is sample-dependent.

Measured history

Measured values (sample-dependent), not a forecast.
Measured as ofNo threshold in title — dispute (volume sample)Threshold in title — dispute (volume sample)Sample (n)
——1522
——1526
——1526
——1526
——1527
——1527
——1527
——1528
——1528
——1528
——1529
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
——1530
27.1%1.4%1530
27.1%1.4%1530
27.1%1.4%1530
27.1%1.4%1530
27%1.4%1531
27%1.4%1531
26.9%1.4%1532
26.9%1.4%1533
26.9%1.4%1534
26.9%1.4%1534
26.9%1.4%1534
26.9%1.4%1534
26.9%1.4%1534
27%1.4%1534
27%1.4%1534
27%1.4%1534
27%1.3%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.8%1.4%1534
26.2%1.4%1536
26.2%1.4%1536
26.2%1.4%1536
26.2%1.4%1536
26.2%1.4%1536
26%1.4%1536
26%1.3%1536
26%1.3%1536
25.9%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.8%1.3%1537
25.8%1.3%1537
25.8%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.9%1.3%1537
25.8%1.3%1537
25.8%1.3%1539
25.8%1.3%1539
25.8%1.3%1539
25.7%1.3%1540
25.7%1.3%1541
25.8%1.3%1541
25.8%1.3%1541
25.6%1.3%1543
25.1%1.3%1544
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1545
25.1%1.3%1546
25.1%1.3%1546
25.1%1.3%1547
25.1%1.3%1547
25.3%1.3%1547
25.3%1.3%1548
25.3%1.3%1548

Questions

Do Polymarket markets whose title states no checkable threshold get disputed more?

Yes, in both samples. In the high-volume sample, markets whose title states no checkable threshold disputed 25.3% (of 513) vs 1.3% for those whose title does (of 1035); in the chronological sample, 0.6% vs 0.4%. This is read from the title alone — the resolution rules are not read, so a market resolved objectively but worded loosely counts as stating no threshold. The direction is the fact; the magnitude is sample-dependent. Base-rate fact from UMA resolution records (Gamma) as of 2026-10-22, not a prediction. polym.uk/data/polymarket-uma-resolution-risk.json

How much does the wording of the title change dispute risk on Polymarket?

Titles that state a checkable threshold dispute far less: 1.3% vs 25.3% in the high-volume sample (of 1035 and 513 markets), 0.4% vs 0.6% in the chronological one. Direction is robust across samples; magnitude is not. Descriptive base-rate fact from UMA resolution records (Gamma) as of 2026-10-22, not a prediction. polym.uk/data/polymarket-uma-resolution-risk.json

Data & API: polym.uk/data/polymarket-uma-resolution-risk.json · methodology at /methodology. This is a base-rate fact (provenance in the header), not a prediction of any single market.